Reply to an orthodox Deleuzian who has read only a few Deleuze (I guess): “The ‘deepening of immanence’ is too rhizomatic to overcome the circularity of the reflexivity of becoming. Deleuze, in his early work, Difference and Repetition, attempted to disambiguate this immanent reflexivity of expressionism. Via Spinoza, he sought to re-inscribe the Spinozist substance … Continue reading On Immanence
'Being is the scandal of Nature waiting for a new host' 